W3C | TAG | Previous: 31 Mar teleconference | Next: 14 April 2003 teleconf

Agenda for 7 Apr 2003 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive

Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (30min)

1. Confirm Chair (NW), Scribe.
2. Accept 31 Mar telecon minutes?
3. Accept this agenda?
4. Accept summary of TAG activity?
5. Next meeting: 14 April?

1.1 Meeting planning

• Please register for AC meeting
• The TAG will strive to organize a virtual meeting shortly after the WWW Conference. See thoughts from SW on organizing a virtual meeting.
  Completed action TBL 2003/03/31: Propose June dates (after 4 June). (See questionnaire)
• Upcoming discussions:
  • The TAG expects to discuss its presentation to the AC on 14 and 21 April.
  • Will 8:30-9:30 slot be ok?

1.2 W3C Track Presentation

• W3C track
• Notes from Paul Cotton

2. Technical (60min)

2.1 Architecture document

See also: findings.

1. 26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
   1. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under 2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft
   2. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
   3. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste and put into DC writing.
   4. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that takes language from internet media type registration, propose for arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from CP10.
   5. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions chapter of arch doc related to message passing, a dual of shared state.

2.2 Issues the TAG intends to discuss

• namespaceDocument-8
  • Next steps on RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray/Paul Cotton
• IRIEverywhere-27
  • Action CL 2003/03/31: Revised position statement on use of IRIs.
• URIEquivalence-15
  • SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where Tim Bray text has been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this issue to pending state.
• xmlIDSemantics-32
  • See Chris Lilley draft finding
• abstractComponentRefs-37
• Updates or reports on other issues?

2.3 Issues that have associated action items

• contentTypeOverride-24
  • See email from DC to Voice Browser WG.
  • Completed action IJ 2003/03/24: Draft up some language; make connection to error-handling issue. TAG position with rationale why to not override server value of content type. (Done)
• xlinkScope-23
  • Status report?
  • See draft, and SW message to CG chairs.
• siteData-36
  • Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
• xmlFunctions-34
  • Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to XML Core work. See email from TimBL capturing some of the issues.
• binaryXML-30
  • Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on adding to survey.
  • Next steps to finding? See summary from Chris.
• contentPresentation-26
  • Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space. Deadline 3 March.
• rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
  • Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema desideratum (RQ-23).
• uriMediaType-9
  • Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
• HTTPSubstrate-16
  • Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended to be excluded from RFC 3205
  • See message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
• errorHandling-20
  • Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3) robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error has been signaled. Deadline first week of March.
• metadataInURI-31
  • Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
• fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
  1. Connection to content negotiation?
  2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
  3. No actions associated / no owner.

3. Other actions

• Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with PLH on this. Revisit this end of April.