See also: IRC log
<JacekK> minutes: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070130
Minutes are approved
<scribe> ACTION: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work things out with the Usage Guide [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070206#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: JacekK to move the test suite to the W3C site [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070206#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: JacekK to reply to Mary about the limitation for only global element declaration and type definition for schema mappings [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070206#action03]
Jacek: due to US daylight savings time, next calls will be an hour later in US
... hope to be able to go Rec at same time as WSDL
... Please supply resources for our W3C page
Jacek: Precond and effects material has been put in Usage Guide
John: SWRL example is long and unreadable. Can it be in a better format?
Jacek: Can have both, can get previous abstract representation from CVS
John: will send e-mail on readable version.
Jacek: Some problems in WSMO syntax
BNS: agree, will fix.
Tomas: should also clarify namespaces
John: What is o#package?
Jacek: hash instead of colon is a WSMO convention
BNS: Will make a more usable namespace name
Jacek: Karthic has proposed some text, but will have to wait until he is here to discuss it
Ajith: It was for Semantics of non-functional aspects of the services. Should be done in a different way.
... shouldn't be a modelReference
Jacek: Could be a modelReference on service since it is not forbidden
... Not a real clean separation, but that is the WSDL distinction between service and interface
... non-functional annotations should be on service
... could also be done using policy, but shouldn't preclude modelReference for non-functional semantics
John: We can send a word document around and then can send to WS-Policy group.
Jacek: Yes (hopefully as PDF), we could discuss and then suggest to policy group.
Joel: So this is to see how tools use particular 2.0 and 1.1 wsdl
Jacek: Want to see if parsers can interpret these files.
... I made the WSDL as specific as possible, single annotation.
Ajith: WSDL 1.1 files should be that way
Jacek: Ajith, please check and let me know.
... Also included a unannotated WSDL
... Meeting ends