W3C

Semantic Annotations for WSDL WG teleconference

4 Jul 2006

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
CB, LF, LH, JK, JM, CP, EP, BNS, CV
Regrets
RA, JBD, JH, JF, MK, TP, AS, TV
Chair
JacekK
Scribe
carlos, ericP

Contents


<JacekK> scribe: carlos

approval of minutes

RESOLUTION: both f2f and last telecon minutes approved

action item review

<JacekK> scribe: ericP

<scribe> ACTION: Terry to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July [ONGOING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action01]

<scribe> ACTION: EricP to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July [ONGOING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action02]

<scribe> ACTION: Amit and Rama (and anybody interested) to suggest definition of semantics [ONGOING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action03]

<scribe> ACTION: ericP to use Amazon WSDL as a real concrete example [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action04]

<scribe> ACTION: Rama to try and come up with a better annotation for the subsection "Annotating operations with model references" [ONGOING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action05]

<scribe> ACTION: team contacts to let the editors know about the standard reference style [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action06]

<scribe> ACTION: ericP to create the comments list public-ws-semann-comments [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action07]

<scribe> ACTION: jacekk to check moving the f2f by one day later [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action08]

administrivia

PROPOSED: change next f2f August 30,31 in Turin, Italy

Jacek: the host has no problem with this

Laurent: +1

RESOLUTION: next f2f August 30,31 in Turin, Italy

Telcons telcons August 1, August 8 cancelled

Other chair for July 18, July 25 (volunteers?)

Document status, publication

<JacekK> scribe: carlos

Jacek: first draft published

What does modelReference on wsdl:interface mean?

Jacek: open issue about this? Our intention is currently reflected in the draft.

John: put something in the examples doc

Jacek: no issue to be generated

Issue 23: relationship of interface annotations in face of interface extension

Jacek: Kunal and John propose generating a transitive closure
... not necessary and perhaps even incorrect
... proposes modelRef to apply in their scope
... it should not propagate through interface extension

John: what happens if there is one in the parent?

Jacek: the modelRef on this parent interface applies to those operations included in the extended interface

Eric: no possibility to preclude contradicting refs
... what happens when different languages are used?

Jacek: this applies when several people are annotating

Eric: you might get partial interpretations

Laurent: two semantics possible extension and specialization

Jacek: summary: inheritance interesting

Laurent: in specialization, the super axioms apply; in extension, the super axioms apply to something disconnected from the extension, so additiveness would be ok th

Jacek: Kunal and John proposed the modelRefs to apply on extending interfaces

RESOLUTION: model references from extended interfaces also apply on extending interface

Issue 24: efficiency of resolving the type of model

John: not very important at the moment

Laurent: agrees

APPROVED to defer

Issue 22: revisit section on WSDL 1.1 mapping

John: have a deep look on it

Eric: volunteers?

claudio: previously proposed backward compatibility to support Parlay X WS
... big percent of published services will be based on WSDL 1.1
... we should put effort on this to find implementors

John: create a group (task force?) for this

<scribe> ACTION: John, Kunal, Claudio to revise section on mapping to WSDL 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action09]

Laura: base this on the case study

Claudio: will send a draft on the case study
... on Parlay X about defining backward compatible solution for WSDL 1.1
... will be done during this week

Issue 12: WSDL 1.1 extensibility?

Jacek: can be closed as obsolete

RESOLUTION: close issue 12 as obsolete

other business

Jacek: focus on examples and WSDL 1.1 for the future

Eric: provide more examples

Jacek: future telecons to discuss the Amazon example from Eric

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: John, Kunal, Claudio to revise section on mapping to WSDL 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action09]
 
[PENDING] ACTION: Amit and Rama (and anybody interested) to suggest definition of semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action03]
[PENDING] ACTION: EricP to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: Rama to try and come up with a better annotation for the subsection "Annotating operations with model references" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action05]
[PENDING] ACTION: Terry to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action01]
 
[DONE] ACTION: ericP to create the comments list public-ws-semann-comments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action07]
[DONE] ACTION: ericP to use Amazon WSDL as a real concrete example [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action04]
[DONE] ACTION: jacekk to check moving the f2f by one day later [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action08]
[DONE] ACTION: team contacts to let the editors know about the standard reference style [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060704#action06]