ISSUE-187: Public Comment 1
Public Comment 1
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- MMIArchLLC
- Raised by:
- James Barnett
- Opened on:
- 2011-06-21
- Description:
- Hallo,
I have been reviewing the current specification. Even though it yet makes
quite a mature impression I found some flaws that may should be revised.
The .xsd files in Appendix C require a valid mmi-representation to have
qualified attributes.
------------------------------------------------------------
attributeFormDefault="qualified"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
------------------------------------------------------------
Given that it seems Appendix B is not in line with the spec.
Examples there (see exerpt below) are not using qualified attributes.
------------------------------------------------------------
<mmi:newContextRequest source="someURI" target="someOtherURI"
requestID="request-1">
</mmi:newContextRequest>
------------------------------------------------------------
On the other side examples in Appendix E are valid to the xsd definition:
------------------------------------------------------------
<mmi:startRequest mmi:requestID="1.237204761416E12"
mmi:context="IM_dcc3c320-9e88-44fe-b91d-02bd02fba1e3"
mmi:target="GUI">
<mmi:contentURL>login</mmi:contentURL>
<mmi:data>
<gui resourceid="login" xml:lang="de-DE">
<data id="back" enabled="false"/>
<data id="next" enabled="false"/>
</gui>
</mmi:data>
</mmi:startRequest>
------------------------------------------------------------ - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-187 Public Comment 1 (from Jim.Barnett@alcatel-lucent.com on 2011-06-21)
- ISSUE-187: Pubic Comment 1 [MMIArchLLC] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-06-21)
Related notes:
DISPOSITION=ACCEPTED
ACCEPTANCE=IMPLICIT
Display change log