W3C | TAG | Previous:12 Aug | Next: 26 Aug

Agenda for 19 August 2002 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive

Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (15min)

1. Confirm scribe and Chair (SW)
2. Roll call. Regrets: PC, DO, TBL
3. Accept 12 Aug minutes
4. Accept this agenda
5. Next meeting? Proposed 26 Aug.
6. Call to action: consider face-to-face agenda.

1.2 Completed actions?

1. Action IJ 2002/08/12: Indicate that issue URIMediaType-9 is not indicated as closed.
2. Action IJ 2002/0812: Revise arch document to account for URI proposal; send out announcement to www-tag in 24 hours. Make it clear that we may not respond to all feedback. Say that we are not committing to respond, but not to worry; open action items won't just be dropped. Done.

2. Technical (60min)

2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document (45min)

See also: findings.

1. Architecture document
   1. Review of comments on 13 Aug Arch Doc.
   2. Action DC 2002/08/12: Ask www-tag for volunteers to work with TAG (and possibly IETF) on HTTP URI stuff; CRISP. [This action supersedes the previous action: Ask IESG when IETF decided not to use HTTP URIs to name protocols.]
   3. Action TBL: 2002/07/15: Create a table of URI properties.
   4. Action IJ 2002/07/08: Produce WD of Arch Doc. Harvest from DanC's URI FAQ. Deadline 30 August.
2. Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use.
   • Action PC 2002/07/08: Propose alternative cautionary wording for finding regarding IANA registration. Refer to "How to Register a Media Type with IANA (for the IETF tree) "

2.2 Priority issues (30min)

1. httpRange-14: Need to make progress here to advance in Arch Document.
2. RFC3023Charset-21:
   1. Chris sent information to www-tag. What is necessary to close this issue?
3. Status of URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on URI canonicalization and email from Martin in particular. See more comments from Martin.
   1. What should a finding look like for this?
4. xlinkScope-23
   1. Priority of this?
5. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query strings?
   • ACTION DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue (bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that it's on their radar. See discussions from 24 Jun TAG teleconf.
6. augmentedInfoset-22:
   • Request from Tim Bray to decide this issue (disposition = closed). Pushback from Simon St. Laurent.
   • ACTION DC 2002/06/17: Talk to XML Schema WG about PSVI. Report to tag, who expects to decide whether to add as an issue next week. DanC has sent email; awaiting reply from XML Scheme WG.
7. deepLinking-25
   1. Action PC 2002/07/22: Ask Henrik Frystyk Nielsen to provide us with a precis of the ruling. Done: awaiting reply from Henrik.
8. uriMediaType-9: Status of negotiation with IETF? See message from DanC.
   • Action TBL: Get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding.

2.3 New issues?