W3C | TAG | Previous: 24 Jun | Next: 8 July

Agenda for 1 July 2002 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive

Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (15min)

1. Confirm scribe
2. Roll call. Regrets: DO, PC, TB
3. Accept this agenda
4. Next meeting? Proposed 8 July. Regrets: TBL
5. Accept 24 June minutes
6. Confirm status of completed actions
7. Confirm status of withdrawn actions [None]
8. Clarify status of findings, improve awareness of them.

1.2 Completed actions?

1. IJ: Ask TBL to take ownership of issue xlinkScope-23.
2. IJ: Ask SW to send a thank-you to the XMLP WG regarding SOAP/GET. See their email to TAG regarding MIME types.
3. IJ: Ask SW to write thank-you to XMLP WG. See Stuart's email to XMLP WG Chair.

2. Technical (75min)

2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document (45min)

See also: findings.

1. Architecture document
   1. Ready to publish?
   2. ACTION IJ 2002/03/18: Integrate/combine one-page summaries (Revised 1 July)
   3. ACTION TBL 2002/05/05: Negotiate more of IJ time for arch doc
   4. ACTION RF 2002/06/24: Write a paragraph on technical and political aspects of URIs and URI References.
2. Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use
   1. ACTION DC: research the bug in the svg diagram. There are two votes to remove the diagram (DC and TB).
   2. ACTION NW 2002/06/24: Produce PNG version of image as well.
3. Qnames as identifiers
   1. Action NW 2002/06/24: Follow up on Rick Jelliffe comments/proposal.
4. Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics
   1. Status of discussion about this finding?

2.2 Priority issues (30min)

1. Status of URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on URI canonicalization and email from Martin in particular.
2. RFC3023Charset-21
   • ACTION CL 2002/6/03: Write up the issue in the next day or so. Done (tag only)
3. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query strings?
   • ACTION DC 2002/06/10: Send note to WSA WG expressing concern about normative binding for GET.
   • ACTION DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue (bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that it's on their radar. See discussions from 24 Jun TAG teleconf.
   • Have we closed issue whenToUseGet-7?
4. If we get here: httpRange-14, namespaceDocument-8

2.3 New issues?

1. Bad practice: Overriding HTTP content-type with a URI reference.See email from TBL.

Request for after 1 July:

1. augmentedInfoset-22
   1. ACTION DC 2002/06/17: Talk to XML Schema WG about PSVI. Report to tag, who expects to decide whether to add as an issue next week. Done (email to Schema WG).