Literals as Subjects: Revision history

16 July 2010

• curprev 02:1302:13, 16 July 2010‎ Nrixham talk contribs‎ 5,824 bytes +105‎ →‎Proposals

13 July 2010

• curprev 23:4523:45, 13 July 2010‎ Dbooth talk contribs‎ 5,719 bytes +146‎ →‎Why do this work now?
• curprev 23:2023:20, 13 July 2010‎ Dbooth talk contribs‎ 5,573 bytes +56‎ →‎Why not do this work?
• curprev 23:1323:13, 13 July 2010‎ Dbooth talk contribs‎ 5,517 bytes +26‎ →‎Why do this work now?

12 July 2010

• curprev 09:2709:27, 12 July 2010‎ Ivan talk contribs‎ 5,491 bytes −9‎ No edit summary

11 July 2010

• curprev 16:5916:59, 11 July 2010‎ Sandro talk contribs‎ 5,500 bytes +162‎ →‎Proposals: refactor a bit
• curprev 16:4816:48, 11 July 2010‎ Sandro talk contribs‎ 5,338 bytes −1‎ →‎Proposals
• curprev 16:4816:48, 11 July 2010‎ Sandro talk contribs‎ 5,339 bytes +97‎ →‎Proposals: link to Graham's proposal

9 July 2010

• curprev 08:2808:28, 9 July 2010‎ Ivan talk contribs‎ 5,242 bytes +602‎ No edit summary
• curprev 08:2008:20, 9 July 2010‎ Ivan talk contribs‎ 4,640 bytes −1‎ No edit summary
• curprev 08:1708:17, 9 July 2010‎ Ivan talk contribs‎ 4,641 bytes +38‎ No edit summary

8 July 2010

• curprev 22:0122:01, 8 July 2010‎ Azimmerm talk contribs‎ 4,603 bytes +4,603‎ Created page with 'This page summarises and synthesises the long and abundant discussion on the Semantic Web public mailing list about allowing literals in the subject position of an RDF triple. Th…'