| | XML
Charter of the XML Core Working Group
April 2002
Paul Grosso, Arbortext, co-chair
Arnaud Le Hors, IBM, co-chair
Liam Quin, staff contact,
for Tim Berners-Lee, Director
The XML Core Working Group is a Working Group of the W3C
and follows the working group process described in the
Process Document.
Except as outlined elsewhere in this charter, the Working Group
follows the
Common Procedures for XML
Working Groups.
This is an extension of the
charter for this Working Group. It extends and supersedes the Working
Group's
previous
charter of March 2000 until September 2003 when the XML Activity
Charter expires.
The mission of the XML
Core Working Group is to maintain and develop as needed core XML
specifications. Specifically, it is responsible for
supporting the XML 1.0 Recommendation,
maintaining it and its Errata document in
response to reported
errata and other comments,
and providing careful updates (such as
the XML 1.1
revision) as warranted. It is also responsible for handling the
ongoing life cycles of the following specifications:
This working group also may do work in related supporting areas
such as:
- developing write-ups on XML processor classifications;
- review and coordinate discussion on the definition of the MIME type for
XML;
- XML Fragment Interchange,
though that work is currently suspended.
The following tasks are included within the scope of this working
group:
- Errata to XML 1.0
- Since XML 1.0 became a W3C Recommendation in February of 1998,
some number of errors or inconsistencies have been detected in the
specification. The XML Core WG issued a Second Edition of the XML 1.0
Recommendation in October 2000 with various corrections/clarifications
to date folded in. This ongoing task is to continue to evaluate
potential errata, to publish the related corrections/clarifications,
and from time to time to fold them into a new edition of the XML 1.0
specification.
- Tracking Internationalization Developments relating to XML
1.0
- Input from the Internationalization WG on changes produced by
updates UNICODE and ISO 10646, and their work on equivalence and
normalization of Unicode strings has driven the XML 1.1
project which will likely lead to a minor update to the XML 1.0
Recommendation.
- XML Processing Model
- Define an XML vocabulary for describing
the inputs and outputs to XML processes and a
method of describing XML processing in such
a way that operations such as schema validation,
XInclude processing, and other processes defined
by W3C and non-W3C specifications can be executed
in the order needed to obtain a particular result.
- Testing and QA
- Publish and mantain conformance test suites for XML 1.0, and
for other specifications where possible.
- Namespaces
- As the community gains experience with the Namespaces in XML
Recommendation, especially during the development of schema
facilities, refinements and new requirements have arisen. This working
group provides a forum to address them, and is tasked to maintain an
Errata
document and potential
errata list as well as to consider the task of drafting and
releasing a new version of the Namespaces in XML specification.
- Information Set
- This specification defines an abstract data set called the XML
Information Set (Infoset). Its purpose is to provide a consistent set
of definitions for use in other specifications that need to refer to
the information in a well-formed XML document
- XInclude
- This specification defines a processing model and syntax for
general purpose inclusion. Inclusion is accomplished by merging a
number of XML Infosets into a single composite Infoset. Specification
of the XML documents (infosets) to be merged and control over the
merging process is expressed in XML-friendly syntax (elements,
attributes, URI References).
- XML Base
- This specification proposes a facility, similar to that of HTML
BASE, for defining base URIs for parts of XML documents.
- XML MIME type
- The XML Core WG needs to review and comment on work on the
definition of the MIME type for XML (see RFC 3023).
- XML processors classification
- The XML 1.0 Recommendation only defines two categories of XML
processors: validating and non-validating. There may, however, be a need
for having a finer classification that would distinguish the various
non-validating processors: for example, those that expand external
parsed entities from those that don't.
- Associating Stylesheets with XML
- Since Associating
Style Sheets with XML documents became a W3C Recommendation in
June of 1999, at least one
issue has been raised. This task will be to address such uncovered
issues, and issue an errata as deemed appropriate.
This charter extends the ongoing work of the XML Core WG. Since a
sizable portion of this WG's work is ongoing in nature, milestones and
success consist of regular updates to Errata documents and existing
specifications. The efforts of this working group get allocated among
any number of ongoing tasks on this WG's task list. Current work still
in the pre-Recommendation stage is as follows:
The WG will also study the advisability of a version 2.0 of the XML
specification and may undertake the preparation of such a
specification, if deemed advisable.
This working group is expected to continue for the duration of the
XML Activity, through September 2003.
The XML Core WG chair participates in the XML Coordination Group to
help track dependencies. In addition to all the WGs in the XML
Activity, the following working groups are also expected to provide
last call review of deliverables of this working group:
- DOM
- The DOM specifications provide APIs that rely on the existence of
an underlying XML information set.
- XSL
- The XSL specification uses patterns that match rules to the
abstract objects in the XML document's information set.
- I18N WG
- Which defines minimum requirements for internationalized
documents, and in particular works on equivalence and normalization of
Unicode strings.
Effective participation is expected to consume one workday per week
for each WG member (including the W3C Team principal and alternate);
two days per week for editors. Members must continue to fulfill the
participation requirements or they will be dropped from the Working
Group. (The participation of either one of the principal or alternate
fulfills the member company's participation requirement.)
The initial co-chairs of this WG are Paul Grosso, Arbortext,
and Arnaud Le Hors, IBM.
Members must treat all Member-only documents as confidential within
W3C and use reasonable efforts to maintain this confidentiality and
not to release this information to the general public or press.
excerpt from section
1.1.3 -
Member Confidentiality of the W3C
Process
All documents appearing on the Member Web site must be respected by
those authorized to consult the site as confidential within W3C. W3C
Members must agree to use reasonable efforts to maintain this
confidentiality and not to release this information to the general
public or press.
excerpt from section 2.4.2
- Communication of the W3C
Process
The proceedings of this working group are member-confidential,
subject to exceptions made by the chair.
W3C, and all W3C Working Groups, are accountable to the Web
community as a whole for the quality of W3C technical work. In
support of this public accountability, this working group will
periodically (e.g. monthly) make public a summary of all
technical decisions made since the last public summary, and
the rationales for these decisions.
The XML Core WG has a group home page that
records the history of the group, provides access to the archives,
meeting minutes, task list and current documents, membership list, and
other relevant documents and resources. It is maintained by the Chairs
in collaboration with the W3C staff contact.
The working group uses a mailing list for technical communication,
supplemented by teleconferences approximately once per week. The
twice-per-year W3C Technical Plenary meetings are expected to fulfill
the need for face-to-face meetings.
To be successful, we expect the XML Core WG to have 10 or more
active principal members for its duration.
The W3C staff contact for this WG is, initially, Liam Quin. It is
expected that this WG would consume about 30% of the contact's time
including administrative logistics.
Communications resources for press and media relations and speaking
appearances or meeting planning resources are amortized across the
working groups in the XML Activity and concentrated in the XML
Coordination Group.