- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 22:27:42 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Greg, others, here's my review of the SD document to address action 232: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/232 The document is in pretty good shape IMO and I see no reasons why it should not be published. Birte Status of this Document ... Furthermore, the extra "URL" property for describing the location of a dataset description file was dropping*<-dropped* in preference of using dereferencable sd:Dataset URIs. 3.2.2 sd:Language An instance of sd:Language represents a subset of the SPARQL language... @@ Better word than "subset" to describe this? How about saying: An instance of sd:Language describes a class of the SPARQL queries that is supported by an sd:Service. 3.2.5 sd:EntailmentRegime (as described in SPARQL 12.6 @@ old sparql spec reference) could be replaced by adding a reference to the entailment regimes doc: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/ @@ need to include this in the references section. <- Namespaces Should be replced by an entry in the reference section. 3.2.6 sd:EntailmentProfile An entialment profile <- An ent*ai*lment profile 3.3 Instances @@ add these pages to the references section. Should be added where possible 3.3.2 sd:SPARQL11Query sd:SPARQL10Query <- sd:SPARQL1*1*Query 3.4.13 sd:resultFormat @@ need to include this in the references section. Can we get this done? 3.4.17 sd:graph ... Is it not the case that the domain is also sd:NamedGraph? The rdfs:domain of sd:graph is sd:NamedGraph. -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 02:28:18 UTC