Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc)

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:22:17 +0100, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>  
wrote:
> I didn't mean XSD specifically, it could be RelaxNG (as being used by  
> the SVG committee, for example).
>
> I understand that text/html(5) is not to be validated by an XML  
> validation tool, but as text/xhtml(5) has to be valid and conforming XML  
> - then I would expect some schema against which it could be validated...

Why is prose not enough? (There's no text/xhtml by the way, just  
application/xhtml+xml.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 10:38:18 UTC