- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:33:55 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
andrea-perego has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: == Collection implementation evidence for DCAT-2 == I started preparing a spreadsheet to collect implementation evidence, based on the table in the DCAT 2014 implementation report: https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_Implementations#Summary_of_terms_usage You can find it here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eEVUuPFAGO2GjS5ocxylY8T1AlpqlwnOTc3er_Mhcv4/edit?usp=sharing In the spreadsheet I added all the classes now in DCAT-2, along all the properties explicitly or implicitly associated with them. I also marked with a gray background those classes/properties which are a legacy from DCAT 2014 - and for which I guess we don't need to provide implementation evidence. Finally, I used other formatting for specifying the new classes / properties, "recommended" properties, those inherited from `dcat:Resource`, those inherited from parent classes (see the "legenda" tab in the spreadsheet for details). @dr-shorthair , @agbeltran , @davebrowning , @pwin , do you think this approach could make sense? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/767 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 18 February 2019 22:33:56 UTC