[html] Issue: why is "content language" pragma processing not equivalent to HTTP Content-Language? marked as i18n

r12a has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/html as 
"i18n":

== why is "content language" pragma processing not equivalent to HTTP 
Content-Language? ==
was:
### I18N-ISSUE-129: document unclear on why content language pragma 
processing not equivalent to HTTP Content-Language? ###

Migrated from Bugzilla: 
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22719
@aphillips

> Pragma directives 
(http://w3c.github.io/html/document-metadata.html#pragma-directives)
>
>The content language pragma processing is called out as "not 
equivalent to HTTP Content-Language", but it doesn't say how or why. 
>
>From the context, it appears that HTTP Content-Language doesn't 
affect document processing, so that would be the "how", but this 
should be spelled out.

The note is still there, and the reason is still ambiguous. Need to do
 a bit more research here, unless anyone's already figured it out.

See https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/261

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 12:08:35 UTC