- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:30:22 +0200
- To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org
Hi Peter, Le 29/08/2018 à 23:18, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : > The QUIC API for WebRTC [0] asserts it is an Editor's Draft, which is a > spec status [1] reserved for official working group documents. For sake of clarity, respec (the tool used to produce some of the W3C documents) is not authoritative on this; the Process Document only has this to say about Editor's Draft: "Working Groups and Interest Groups may make available "Editor's drafts". Editor's drafts have no official standing whatsoever, and do not necessarily imply consensus of a Working Group or Interest Group, nor are their contents endorsed in any way by W3C." In other words, the status and meaning associated with editors draft as it stands varies from WG to WG, and cannot really be assumed to have any standing whatsoever. To reduce some of this uncertainty, some groups have adopted the "unofficial draft" label. HTH, Dom > [0] https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/ > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki/specStatus > > [2] https://www.w3.org/2018/07/webrtc-charter.html > > [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2018Jun/0191.html > > [4] > https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/297722ededba1c80e2a8768100129af300f67dbf/webrtc/RTCQuicTransport.https.html >
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2018 13:30:26 UTC