- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:16:33 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Simon Cox <simon.cox@csiro.au>, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
Dear all, Way back, I took an action [0] to seek a review of OWL Time by the Internationalization group (known as i18n in the jargon). I did this, action-182, and mentioned to my colleague Richard Ishida that we'd not had a reply. He was sure we had - and I've found it, although it's on their mailing list, not this one. See [1] I apologise for only just finding this now. I also note that this reply is from an (informed) individual and not the WG as a whole. There's a checklist to go through [2] which ought to be done before we declare victory on the ontology. I know we're likely to vote to publish the next iteration of the ontology soon, and I don't want to hold that up, but I suggest that in so doing, we note somewhere that we have had that review and will go through the checklist, seeking further guidance from i18n if needed. Phil [0] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/182 [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2016JulSep/0029.html [2] https://www.w3.org/International/techniques/developing-specs?collapse -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 19:16:28 UTC