- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 20:23:49 -0500
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I also addressed Issue 193 [5] in some of these commits. I'll close that one too, unless you think it needs more work. Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net On Nov 9, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > Changes that were requested to deal with RDF conversion terminology have been commited, and I will close the issues in 24 hours unless I hear objections. > > The affected issues are issue 125 Define from/to RDF algorithms in terms of standard RDF [1] and issue 192 What's a "string representation in fromRDF [2]. > > Issue 125 is addressed in [3] using the suggested terminology. > > Issue 192 is addressed in [3] by using either "canonical lexcial form" or "expanded form". I also added the term "expanded IRI form", which can actually represent either an absolute IRI or a blank node. > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > > [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/125 > [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/192 > [3] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/846616d3f8fc6bffa4af31bbdd952c3bc893e56f > [4] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/168ba91fde86eb68d58de0f911aa6873d1200865
Received on Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:24:30 UTC