- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:32:42 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim, Can we try and reach agreement on this issue? Table 4: is about primary elements. So no change required here. Should we consider Table 4(bis), which is about secondary elements. In a first approximation, it would contain the following entries: wasStartedBy: Activity x Activity (starter) wasEndedBy: Activity x Activity (ender) wasDerivedFrom: Entity x Activity mentionOf: Entity x Entity(Bundle) wasAssociatedWith: Acivity x Entity (Plan) actedOnBehalfOf: Agent x Activity Figure 5 contains the required associated ender/starter from the association classes. Cheers, Luc On 11/07/12 21:25, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > I don't think there is a problem. > > Table 4 is introduced as follows: > > While not all PROV-DM relations are binary, they all involve two > primary elements. Hence, <a href="#relations-at-a-glance">Table 4</a> > indexes all relations according to their two primary elements > (referred to as subject and object). > > > wasStartedBy is primarily from an activity to an entity. > > Table 5 has the correct syntax wasStartedBy(id;a2,e,a1,t,attrs), > including the starter activity a1. > > Luc > > On 11/07/12 18:12, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-450: DM tables "incomplete" (specifically: activity ending >> activity) [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/450 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> During discussions with an external reviewer: >> >> He was looking for "activity ended by activity". >> >> He was looking at >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html today. >> >> >> I pointed him to >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-End >> AND the phrase "or to an activity, known as ender ◊ that generated >> the trigger." >> >> >> His response: >> >> [[ >> Ah - I see that in the detailed description. Shouldn't there be >> something in tables 4 and 5 as well? It is also missing from fig 5. >> ]] >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> >> -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 15:33:10 UTC