- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:05:29 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Graham, Responses interleaved. On 25/08/11 14:03, Graham Klyne wrote: > On 22/08/2011 23:15, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in >> XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/76 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance >> >> Given that the examples of section 4 are already expressed in RDF >> turtle, is there any value in also expressing them in RDF/XML? Since you seem to target the rdf community, i confirm i see no point in having both rdf turtle and rdf/xml. >> >> If we want some take up by the XML community, we should have proper >> XML examples, with corresponding XML schemas. > > I don't see sufficient value in this, given the provenance aware > applications are likely to deal with RDF anyway (per charter), and the > JSON option provides ease of use. If it's really needed, I'd suggest > making an XML format for provenance discovery service description part > of D5 deliverable. D5 deliverable is about the model, not the PAQ. Luc > > #g > -- >
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 23:06:10 UTC