shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2015-04-17 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2015)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:23:42 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Yiu4M-0008jr-0f@deneb.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec]

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/45

Raised by: Holger Knublauch
On product: SHACL Spec

I think there is enough agreement that SHACL should have an "extension" language to cover cases not addressed by the core vocabulary, and to define new high-level terms (templates). I believe we should get the question clarified whether SPARQL is such an extension language. This question is independent of whether other languages such as JavaScript could also be supported - that would be another ISSUE.

PROPOSAL: SHACL should include SPARQL as an extension language.

Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 00:23:43 UTC