w3process-ISSUE-96 (Errata Pages): Should there be clear requirements on maintaining errata? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] from Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker on 2014-04-23 (public-w3process@w3.org from April 2014)

From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:09:26 +0000
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Wczji-0003MD-Jk@shauna.w3.org>

w3process-ISSUE-96 (Errata Pages): Should there be clear requirements on maintaining errata? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/96

Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)

In Liam Quin's review of chapter 7 it was noted that there are no clear requirements for where and how errata should be maintained, nor whom should actually be notified in practice and how.

Should there be a team-maintained document a la Pubrules, or further requirements in this chapter, in order to clarify where people can expect to find the requirements at any given time?

Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 16:09:27 UTC