- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:55:21 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-537: Notation Section 2.4 [prov-n] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/537 Raised by: Paolo Missier On product: prov-n The syntax for providing statement identifiers is confusing. When instantiated, wasDerivedFrom(e2, e1) is visually idential to wasDerivedFrom(d, e2), the latter being an invalid expression. If the first parameter of an expression is optional, it would be more clear to use a distinct delimiter between the identifier and the subsequent attributes (just as square brackets are used to deliniate optional attributes). That said, named attributes would be optimal.
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 09:55:27 UTC