- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:36:57 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-505: Data Model Section 3 [prov-dm] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/505 Raised by: Luc Moreau On product: prov-dm http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Section_3 ISSUE-463 "PROV-N is a notation aimed at human consumption The interpretation of PROV-N arguments is defined according to their position in the list of arguments. This convention allows for a compact notation." IMO, the goal of human consumption trumps compact notation and using positional arguments hinders the former for the benefit of the latter. See also my comments on the PROV-N spec, especially regarding named attributes. Example 15 shows a semicolon used to separate the optional identifier from the rest of the arguments. This is not consistent with the PROV-N spec.
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 08:36:58 UTC