- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:04:57 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/336 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: Ontology Luc, Paul, Simon, Sam, and MacTed, You and the rest of the working group are welcome to review and provide feedback for the internal 2WD draft located at: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/spwd/for-internal-wg-review/prov-o.html Per http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.03.29#PROV-O please consider the following questions in your feedback: Questions to be reviewed for: * Does the HTML file provide an adequate overview of the OWL design elements? * Do the different organizations of PROV-O HTML and DM complement each other, or is it distracting? * Would any additional comments (or attributes) help you read the cross reference list in PROV-O HTML? * Are the comments within the OWL file adequate to familiarize with the structure? If not, what kinds of comments would help? * Should the OWL file contain any links to documentation (e.g., to the DM, to examples, etc.)? * Can the document be released as a next public working draft? If no, what are the blocking issues?
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 20:04:59 UTC