RE: Call for objections

John,

I believe you were right to request a more formal email on the topic.  Now that one has been posted for Issue-10 we can use the next two weeks to gather feedback.  Looking forward to the formal email on Issue-5 soon.

- Shane

From: John Simpson [mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:26 PM
To: Justin Brookman
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Call for objections

Thanks, Justin.  I just wasn't clear on what was happening.  Maybe that's because I missed yesterday's call. Read the minutes -- delighted they were posted so quickly -- but was still a little uncertain.

John


On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org<mailto:jbrookman@cdt.org>> wrote:


The options were presented to the group on the call on November 6th --- it took us a couple of days to get the options up, but I'd like to stick with the original deadline of November 20th (as was announced on the call and previously).  CFO on ISSUE-10 is here<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-party-10/>, ISSUE-5 should be up soon.

On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:14 PM, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org<mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org>> wrote:


Chairs,

Shouldn't there be a call for objections posted for Issue-6 and Issue-10?  I understood they were to be posted on Nov. 6 and closed on Nov. 20.  Since it's Nov. 7 and they still aren't posted, does that mean the closing date gets pushed back?

Regards,
John

Received on Friday, 8 November 2013 21:30:23 UTC