Re: htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]

Note that there is also an open issue in the RDF WG to introduce another Literal, namely HTMLLiteral. Obviously, if using a non-XML version of HTML5, this may be a necessity...

Ivan

On Oct 20, 2011, at 20:42 , HTML Data Task Force Issue Tracker wrote:

> 
> htmldata-ISSUE-2 (Use of rdf:XMLLiteral): Should Microdata-RDF generate XMLLiteral values [Microdata to RDF]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/htmldata/track/issues/2
> 
> Raised by: Gregg Kellogg
> On product: Microdata to RDF
> 
> Some examples in the wild [1] use an item with Microdata use @itemprop with a HTML content. Current processing rules are to extract the textual content, and remove the markup.
> 
> Should the Microdata to RDF spec parallel RDFa and generate an rdf:XMLLiteral in this case?
> 
> Example simplified use-case:
> 
> <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Book">
>  <h2 itemprop="name">E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time</h2>
> </div>
> 
> [1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/restaurants/8824409/The-Butchers-Arms-Woolhope-Herefordshire-restaurant-review.html
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf