Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013

Dear Bernadette and others,

I have reviewed the section on Stability of the BP document, and I believe
it is not ready for prime time.

Honestly, I would recommend dropping this section or replacing it by a
fairly generic piece of text that only raises stability as a concern (one or
two paragraphs), and points to useful references (further reading). I'm not
an expert on the topic, but I am willing to volunteer to produce this, if
the group agrees this is the way to go.

There is a lot of work on long-term data preservation and the "properties"
described in the text (section 6.3 are quite confusing and do not seem
focused). This is not a simple issue, see, e.g. (a lot of initiatives are
listed including standards on long-term data preservation):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_preservation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAIS

Best regards,
João Paulo





From:  Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
Date:  Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:50 PM
To:  Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
Cc:  Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, "public-gld-wg@w3.org"
<public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013
Resent-From:  <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Resent-Date:  Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:50:54 +0000

Thanks Michael, Bernadette

Since Anne and Ron are not available, any volunteer to take care of section
13. Stability? Biplav? Joao Paulo?

Best,

Boris



On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bernadette Hyland
<bhyland@3roundstones.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> Thanks for circulating.  A couple WG members in yesterday's telecon agreed to
> do a thorough review and comment.  This included Biplav and Joao Paulo.
> 
> Note: We should update assignments to Anne and Ron who are no longer involved
> in the WG AFAIK. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Bernadette
> 
> 
> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Boris Villazón-Terrazas
> <boris.villazon@terrazas.name> wrote:
> 
>> Dear all
>> 
>> Apologies for missing yesterday telecon's ... and for not sending my regrets
>> in advance.
>> 
>> Regarding the BP document, I was working with the BP document including some
>> comments from outside, e.g, Olaf, but I think it's time to try to finalize
>> this first version. We can make the rest of improvements later on
>> 
>> The current version is here [1].
>> 
>> Currently, there are some sections to review, so I would suggest the
>> following section and reviewers:
>> - Background - Bernadette
>> - Linked Open Data Lifecycle -  Boris & Solve the current issue (ISSUE-15)
>> - Vocabulary Selection - Boris/Ghis
>> - URI Construction - John ERickson/Boris
>> - 6. URI Policy for Persistence - Bernadette/John Erickson
>> - 8. Specifying an appropiate License - Bernadette
>> - 9. Security and hosting -  Michael Pendleton
>> - 10. Publishers "Social Contract" -  Bernadette
>> - 11. Pragmatic Provenance -  John Erickson
>> - 12. Versioning -  John Erickson
>> - 13. Stability -  Anne Washington (GMU), Ron Reck
>> - 14. Source Data -  Biplav
>> 
>> Reviewers would have one week to review their section, then we'll have
>> another week to fix the document. I'll be the one to be doing the whole
>> edition, and Bernadette can help me identifying possible minor issues. More
>> help is appreciated.
>> In summary after two weeks we should have a preliminary stable version of the
>> document, so we can publish as a FPWD ....
>> Then, we can continue with the weekly updates and improvements.
>> 
>> What do you think?
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>> Boris
>> 
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html
>> 
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> See [1] for today's minutes.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Benedikt
>>> 
>>> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-01-24>
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>