On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote: > > > > The only question I have is: link uses @rel in HTML; is that allowed for > a Lite? I would think yes, but this may have to be written down somewhere... > > I would say that the use of @rel in <link> is not part of RDFa Lite, if > the values of the @rel attribute would be interpreted by an RDFa processor. > In other words, they can have terms which are ignored, but not CURIEs or > IRIs. > > I am forced to disagree. We have no way of constraining an RDFa Processor to only do things in a Lite context or a non-Lite context. Consequently, any occurrence of @rel is going to be interpreted by a conforming processor. And one conforming Processor cannot work differently than another with regard to the (minimal) triples generated, so all of the values of @rel are going to be processed. In theory a validator could flag the use of @rel on a <link> element, but why? @rel is legal everywhere according to RDFa Lite. At least that is my reading of the Profile. -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 23:06:34 UTC