Re: A really micro schema language

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:35 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:

>
> You once said that you thought the appropriate MicroXPath was XPath 1.0,
> presumably modulo namespaces, PIs, etc.  Have you had any further
> thoughts about that?
>

Though it pains me to say it, I suspect the most appropriate MicroXPath is
CSS3 selectors.

James

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 11:44:01 UTC