- From: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 23:29:38 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Thank you Sandro. I have just pushed the following modifications to the draft: * new section on alternatives [1] * @ericP, please check the link/name for your proposal... * changed the slice operator s/:/../ * changed StepBackward to use a caret s/-/^/ * documented ISSUE-100 * fixed some typos and links I invite people to give me feedback on that version. I am now working on a denotational semantics using SPARQL, as several people (included me) expressed some interest there. My main issue is that SPARQL won't fail when a pattern matches 0 or more than 1 node, which is something unwanted in LD Patch, so the semantics cannot be fully mapped. I am not sure how to address that yet. I welcome ideas. Alexandre [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/ldpatch/ldpatch.html#considered-alternatives On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > On 08/18/2014 07:33 PM, Alexandre Bertails wrote: >> >> Eric, Sandro, >> >> I have started making updates to the LD Patch document to reflect what >> was discussed today. You guys just mentioned adding links this morning >> but I don't have anything better than the document at [1]. >> >> Can you guys confirm that what's there is ok? This gives you an >> opportunity to revise/enhance it. Or did you have something else in >> mind? Is that a link we want to keep forever in the document or just >> during the first WD iterations? >> >> Alexandre >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/LDP_PATCH_Proposals >> > > For TurtlePatch the link is: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/TurtlePatch > > Thanks, > > -- Sandro > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 03:30:10 UTC