- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:05:40 +0200
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc, Err.. I took the definition of quotation directly from the dictionary :-) So you'd have to argue with them. cheers Paul On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/357 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-dm > > > The definition of Quotation [1] is: > > A quotation is the repeat of (some or all of) an entity, such as text or image, by someone other than its original author. > > Do we really mean that I wouldn't be entitled to quote myself? If it's the case, what does it mean to be "someone other than the original author"? are alternates OK? > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#concept-quotation > > > > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 08:06:10 UTC