Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516)

+1

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:

>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Another good point.
>
> I propose to change the sentence as follow:
>
> there must be some underpinning* activity or* activities performing the
> necessary action*(s)* resulting in such a derivation
>
> Luc
>
> On 10/25/2012 12:39 AM, Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D. wrote:
>
> 1.1.15 ISSUE-516 (DerivationAsBundle)<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-516_.28DerivationAsBundle.29>
> Section 5.2.1 states, "there must be some underpinning activities
> performing the necessary actions resulting in such a derivation".  Note
> both "activities" and "actions" are plural.  The statement wasDerivedFrom,
> however, allows only a single activity to be specified.  Is derivation
> intended to support multiple activities (as per the text), and if so, are
> multiple statements necessary (one for each activity)?  The question about
> derivation as a bundle was based on the impression that multiple activities
> might be part of "a derivation" (as per the text).
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>


-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam