Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC

Dear All,

Regrets for today's call.

Best Regards,

Percy

2011/8/30 Marcelo Arenas <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com>

> Dear All,
>
> Regrets for today (in a conference).
>
> Yesterday we discussed with Juan about the direct mapping pending
> issues, so he will be my representative in the conference call :-)
>
> All the best,
>
> Marcelo
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Michael Hausenblas
> <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Please find below the agenda for our tomorrow's conference call.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >        Michael
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > AGENDA Teleconference
> > W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-08-30
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > *16:00-17:00 UTC*
> > Local time:
> >
> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=30&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0
> >
> > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> > Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
> > IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Chair: Michael
> > Scribe: Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. Admin
> >
> > PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/08/23-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
> >
> >
> > 2. Postpone LC deadline
> >
> > Discussion from last time and
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0135.html
> >
> >
> > 3. R2RML
> >
> > ISSUE-61 PENDING REVIEW see
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0133.html
> >
> > ACTION-147 on Richard re ISSUE-29:
> > [[
> > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-29; all places that interpret SQL values as string
> now
> > use "conversion to string"
> > ]]
> >
> >
> > [[
> > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions
> > ]]
> >
> >
> > [[
> > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-51; the spec now demands that “supported RDF types”
> > MUST raise data error, and other types MAY raise data error
> > ]]
> >
> > [[
> > PROPOSAL: Lack of consensus on the syntax question is noted in the issue
> box
> > in Section 4.2, which presents both options. A decision on the question
> will
> > be postponed until after Last Call. This closes ISSUE-57.
> > ]]
> >
> > [[
> > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUES 54, 56, 59, 60; they are addressed in the latest
> > draft.
> > ]]
> > See
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0150.html
> > for details re  ISSUES 54, 56, 59, and 60.
> >
> > [[
> > PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-55, this could be considered for R2RML 1.1
> > ]]
> >
> > [[
> > PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-58, it is an editorial/didactic issue and can be
> > addressed after Last Call
> > ]]
> >
> >
> > 4. DM
> > ISSUE-65 ... do we have a PROPOSAL for this? if yes, please reply here,
> dear
> > DM Editors
> >
> >
> > 5. AOB
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> > Ireland, Europe
> > Tel. +353 91 495730
> > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> > http://sw-app.org/about.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>