Re: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft

+1

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773
> <(512)%20963-3773>
>
> *web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
> wrote:
>
>> Call For Consensus — ends Monday  June 12th at 1:00pm Boston time.
>>
>> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a new Success Criterion for
>> inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Orientation" with the goal of obtaining
>> additional input external to the working group.
>>
>> SC TEXT:
>>
>> "Content is not locked to a specific display orientation
>> <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/terms/21/display-orientation.html>,
>> and functionality of the content is operable in all display orientations,
>> except where display orientation is essential
>> <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/terms/21/essential.html>
>>  for use of the content."
>>
>> Survey results: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/MATF_orientation/
>> Call minutes: <https://www.w3.org/2017/05/30-ag-minutes.html#item04>
>> http://www.w3.org/2017/06/08-ag-minutes.html
>> GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/70
>>
>> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
>>
>> <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/change-of-content_ISSUE-2/guidelines/#change-of-content>
>> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guideline
>> s/#orientation
>>
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
>> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
>> the CfC deadline.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Joshue O Connor
>> Director | InterAccess.ie
>>
>
>