- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:50:42 -0500
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Arnaud, As Holger stated, we have not converged on a design. In order to break the deadlock, we need input from the working group. My proposal is [1], which is very minimalistic. If you can fit this into the agenda this week, I'd be happy to also walk though my proposal. [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications#Proposal_1 -- Arthur On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > After quite some off-list discussions, here is a new proposal for the > metamodel: > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications#Proposal_3 > > I believe this proposal addresses most of the concerns and inefficiencies > (e.g. verbose AbstractXY classes) and was produced as a result of > discussions between Arthur, Simon and myself. However, I do not claim that > all details of this proposal reflect their current view points. I welcome > anyone's input on what aspects are not acceptable yet. > > Arnaud, I would be happy to explain this design to the group in the next > call. > > Thanks, > Holger > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2016 18:51:10 UTC