Re: [W3C LDP WG] Review of the"Best Practice & Guidelines" document...

Thank you Miguel for the thorough review of the document.

Cody, as I didn't contribute much to the document I can take the first
crack at addressing the low hanging comments with minor changes and then we
can discuss on the ones that might introduce any major changes. WDYT ?

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez <
mesteban@fi.upm.es> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’ve finally completed ACTION-96, the review of the “Best Practice &
> Guidelines” document
>
> (https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/96).
>
>
>
> Please find attached the full review report,  and let me just share with
> you the main conclusion.
>
>
>
> In general, the contents do fit the spirit of the document. But I’m not
> sure about
>
> how they are presented. It is not clear to me where the emphasis is on:
> does the
>
> document target LDP technology developers, consumers, or both?
>
>
>
> Most of the best practices (if not all) are not related to the LDP
> specification
>
> in itself (do not tackle implementation specific issues) but to the data
> model that
>
> should be used or in the data produced (LDP technology consumer from my
>
> point of view).
>
>
>
> It might be worth thinking about this and clarify the scope in the
> introduction (impetus)
>
> and maybe group the best practices depending on the target of the best
> practice itself.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>                 Miguel
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Descripción: Logo_OEG]
>
> *Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez*
>
> *Ontology Engineering Group*
>
> *Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos* - *Universidad
> Politécnica de Madrid*
>
> C/ Ciruelos, 2, Boadilla del Monte,
>
> 28660 - Madrid - ESPAÑA
>
> Phone:
>
> +34 91 336 36 70
>
> Fax:
>
> +34 91 352 48 19
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 14:09:26 UTC