Re: uniform "changes since LC" sections (Action-707 part 1 ...)

I have to give my regrets for tomorrow's teleconference - I have a morning conflict.  

I don't quite understand this thread about what is expected of the SotD or whether the editors supposed to make these changes themselves.  

However, as I mentioned in the last teleconference, I have updated the editor's draft of the GSP document to include changes since the *last* publication.   

-- 
Chime Ogbuji
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com)


On Friday, November 2, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> That's correct, Birte. We'd like it as an appendix and then there will 
> be a standard Status section that links to the appendix. This way we can 
> have a consistent SotD section for all documents.
> 
> Lee
> 
> On 11/1/2012 4:09 AM, Birte Glimm wrote:
> > I've put this at the end of the document (appendix) since it seemed to
> > me from the minutes that Sandro wanted it out of the status section,
> > but I haven't been at the teleconf, so I might misinterpret the
> > minutes.
> > 
> > Birte
> > 
> > On 31 October 2012 20:03, Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com (mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com)> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I started putting the "Changes since LC" section into the Update document, cf.
> > > 
> > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#changes-since-lc
> > > 
> > > For completing ACTION-707, I suggest to put this in the same format (i.e move the different versions of how changes were summarized under
> > > the same header and anchor, at the end of the Status sectionfor each document) across all documents, that is:
> > > ------------
> > > <div id="changes-since-lc">
> > > <p><b>Changes since Last Call</b></p>
> > > <p>The following editorial changes have been made since <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-update-20120105/">Last Call</a> publication of this document:</p>
> > > ...
> > > </div>
> > > -----------
> > > 
> > > Since I won't get to this before Friday, if any of the editors has time to do it themselves for their reps. documents,
> > > feel free to follow the example.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the help,
> > > Axel
> > 
>

Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 19:50:24 UTC