- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:31:38 +1000
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Paul, If the W3C is confident that HTML5 will become a published specification, and that the relation (along with associated semantics) being registered is -- within reason -- going to be part of that specification, certainly. Also, be aware that alternate is already in use by Atom <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt>. I can't access the link Ian gave at the moment (whatwg.org appears to be down), so I can't say whether this is an issue. Regards, On 14/08/2010, at 2:17 AM, Paul Cotton wrote: >> I also think that >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-alternate> would work, because we would avoid having to update the registry every time a new WD comes out. > > We could use the "Latest Version" link but only if we agree that we will have to track if any future change in the quoted section causes an impact on the registry information. > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 23:32:13 UTC