- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:34:53 -0800
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Feb 27, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Ben Adida wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> What I meant to say that I agreed with mnot's erratum idea > > It is incorrect to use the term "erratum" to discuss a proposed major > change to a REC with numerous implementors and deployed markup that do > not consider this an error. Oh, please, spare us the grief. The TAG warned over and over and over again that use of QNAMEs (by any name) in contexts where a URI might be found would violate Web architecture because they interfered with the extensibility of URI schemes. If software breaks because of RDFa arrogance, then so be it. ....Roy
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 03:35:22 UTC