- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:47:44 +0900
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "Image Annotation on the Semantic Web"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-image-annotation-20060322/
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:50:45 GMT
First WD
Do you refer to context in this paragraph?
[[[
Annotating images without having a specific goal or task in mind is
often not cost effective: after the target application has been
developed, it turns out that images have been annotated using the
wrong type of information, or on the wrong abstraction level, etc.
]]]
-- Image Annotation on the Semantic Web
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-image-annotation-20060322/#annot_intro
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:50:45 GMT
"Annotated using the wrong type of information" is not necessary
true. It always depends on the context. One particular annotation
might be very useful or completely useless not because of the nature
or the type of information but because of the context of expressing
this annotation.
In Front of a church, one might see
- an architecture
- a piece of history
- a memory of family wedding
- a religious involvement
- a symbol of obscurantism
all with valid associated annotations in their specific context.
The text of the paragraph seems to imply that the developer should
only use "objective" information for metadata.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 05:48:10 UTC