- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:39:36 +0100
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I would suggest the default be html. In general, when people dereference the namespace then a we page seems most appropriate. Paul On Mar 21, 2012, at 23:12, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > Sounds good to me. Not all tools are good enough to send the > appropriate Accept header, so would the default (when no HTML is > requested) be to go to the RDF/XML OWL file? > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:09, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Can we resolve the namespaces to be used for prov? >> >> This is ISSUE-256 , ISSUE-84 , ISSUE-224, ISSUE-281 >> >> Here's the suggestion that seems to stem from the discussion >> >> Namespace is: >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# >> >> This dereferences to a landing page that points to prov-dm and prov-o if >> requesting html >> >> The landing page would like: >> - http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description# >> - or optionally be like the glossary given in >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/fd022426796d/model/prov-glossary.html >> >> Otherwise, conneg would be set to return the appropriate data file depending >> on the request. >> >> I.e .rdt / .ttl depending on the request >> >> See suggestion in ISSUE-281 >> >> Is there any disagreement with this approach? >> >> Thanks >> Paul >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 07:40:18 UTC