- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:17:00 -0500
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 29, 2012, at 12:52 , Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Thanks for the comments. I'll integrate them when I go through the document before staging. On the implementations, we have this page: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvImplementations Oh yes, this has more information than just tools. That being said, once the tools are mature, adding them to the 2001/sw/wiki/Tools would be a good idea. Cheers Ivan > > which we can change in our final version to the wiki or somewhere else. > > cheers > Paul > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Paul, > > Thanks! > > small comments: > > - the header 'PROV family of documents' appears twice > - in the list of documents, the first item should say (this document) instead having a circular reference > - In section 1: 'This instantiated by various serializations' -> 'This is instantiated by various serializations' > - In section 1: 'To help developers and user create valid provenance' -> 'To help developers and users to create valid provenance' > - Section 1: refers to the various blocks in the figure, but it does not say anything about 'PROV-LINKS'. > - The figure is a matter of taste, of course. But I usually look at these figures as, sort of, stacks; for me the figure suggests that the PROV-DM is based on the PROV-DC document. I would probably try to move these somehow on the left side, and leave the PROV-DM block as the base. > - The remark on Prov-O: "This is intended for the Linked Data and Semantic Web community and is useful for developers wishing to create RDFa mark-up." Did you mean 'RDF mark-up'? I do not think that a restriction on RDFa is necessary or useful here... > - I am not sure the term 'Roadmap' is the right one for the header of section 2. 'available documents'? > - In the final version would it be worth making a reference to implementations/tools? A possibility is to link to > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV > > in case you guys fill this with your tools, that is:-) Alternatively, the implementation report may be used as well. > > > As for your questions below: > > > On Nov 27, 2012, at 09:51 , Paul Groth wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > Questions for the reviewers: > > - Can this document be released as FPWD? > > Absolutely. Yes > > > - If not, what are the blocking issues? > > - If yes, are there other issues to work on? > > See my comments above. I do not consider them as blocking. > > Ivan > > > > > The aim is to vote on FPWD release at the teleconference on Thursday. > > Can you please confirm you can review the document ahead of the call? > > I think I am late with it, I do this at the airport of San Jose, and it is still early... But I hope it is helpful nevertheless! > > ivan > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/overview/overview.html > > [2] https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/605 > > > > -- > > -- > > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > > Assistant Professor > > - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | > > Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science > > - The Network Institute > > VU University Amsterdam > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | > Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science > - The Network Institute > VU University Amsterdam ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 15:17:25 UTC