- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:44:03 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Looks good to me. On 30/12/2011, at 11:48 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-30 15:56, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >> On 30/12/2011, at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >>> On 2011-12-30 01:43, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>> One other thing -- >>>> >>>> p2 already has: >>>> >>>>> For 3xx responses, the location SHOULD indicate the server's preferred URI for automatic redirection to the resource. >>>> >>>> There was equivalent text in 2616. So, I think the resolution here is actually pretty minor; we just need to add text to p2 7.3 that reflects this; e.g., >>>> >>>> """A Location header on a 3xx response indicates that a client MAY automatically redirect to the URI provided; see [ref to Location header].""" >>>> >>>> Comments? >>>> ... >>> >>> But that just repeats something the definition of 300 already says, right? >>> >>> "If the server has a preferred choice of representation, it SHOULD include the specific URI for that representation in the Location field; user agents MAY use the Location field value for automatic redirection." -- >>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-17.html#rfc.section.7.3.1.p.3> >> >> Right, but we want to make it clear that this applies to 3xx generically. >> ... > > Ok, works for me. > > Proposed patch: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/325/325.diff> > > Best regards, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2011 15:44:33 UTC