On Sep 27, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Andrew Cunningham <lang.support@gmail.com<mailto:lang.support@gmail.com>> wrote: On 27 September 2013 11:05, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com<mailto:jjc@jclark.com>> wrote: I tried to explain in my last message why I thought tailoring the definition of extended grapheme cluster was not the right approach, and suggested an alternative approach. Let me try to put it more succinctly: the clusters of glyphs between which Thai/Lao letter-spacing inserts space are different from the clusters of glyph corresponding to extended grapheme clusters. The spec for letter-spacing should allow for the fact that for some scripts the typographically correct points to insert letter space do not correspond to boundaries between extended grapheme clusters. +1 Yeah, I understand what you want to explain. But practically speaking: 1. Use A, but implementers can tailor A in any way they need 2. Use anything, but use A as baseline These two look the same thing to me. No? /koji
Received on Saturday, 28 September 2013 04:24:00 UTC