[closed] Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference

/ Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
| * Norman Walsh wrote:
|>I see your point. Would the following change address your concern:
|>
|>Replace:
|>
|>   For locators into XML resources, the format of the fragment
|>   identifier (if any) used within the URI reference is specified by
|>   the XPointer specification [XPTR].
|>
|>With:
|>
|>   If a locator includes a fragment identifer, the syntax of the
|>   fragment identifier is defined by the media type of the
|>   representation returned when the locator is dereferenced. For
|>   locators into XML resources (that is, resources with the media type
|>   "application/xml" or media types that defer to the fragment
|>   identifier syntax of "application/xml" media), the syntax of the
|>   fragment identifier is expected to be defined by the successor to
|>   RFC 3023. Technically, there is no fragment identifier syntax for
|>   XML resources at the time of this writing, though the XPointer
|>   framework and element schemes are explicitly supported by several
|>   XML vocabularies.
|
| This is better; I don't think it's a good idea to include this here but
| it addresses my original concern. Thanks.

Thank you.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.