RE: ISSUE-36: Tool selection for testing of basic pattern assertions

Pete, thanks for the offer of the licences. Practical
involvement/testing resource will always be most welcome and the more
coverage the better of course. With the resources we currently have in
the WG we will have to focus on a subset of the available tools and
maybe this core set will be complemented with other tools important to
W3C members as we gain some momentum.

JonC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Cordell [mailto:petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com] 
> Sent: 25 April 2006 08:27
> To: Downey,P,Paul,XCB R; Paul.V.Biron@kp.org
> Cc: Calladine,J,Jon,XCB5 R; public-xsd-databinding@w3.org; 
> public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-36: Tool selection for testing of basic 
> pattern assertions
> 
> 
> Original Message From: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
> >
> >> What do we do about mainstream tools we don't have licenses or 
> >> environments to run - I don't have much personal 
> experience with SAP 
> >> or TIBCO software, for example.
> >
> > Since SAP and TIBCO are W3C members we can always ask them 
> to donate 
> > copies of their tools for testing purposes.
> 
> 
> I'm happy to donate a license for LMX for this purpose (how 
> many would be 
> required?).  Alternatively, if you come up with a suitable 
> test suite, I 
> could run the tests here.  Or do both!
> 
> (BTW - you will need a C++ compiler to effectively check what 
> is generated. 
> GCC or VC++ are fine.  FWIW, we use Perl to link our test environment 
> together.)
> 
> Pete.
> --
> =============================================
> Pete Cordell
> Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
>                          for XML to C++ data binding visit
>                          http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
>                          (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) 
> =============================================
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 09:41:29 UTC