Change proposal Issue-201

Dear group,

hereby my text proposal for issue-201. It is also open for discussion.

Nick could you please add it to the change list for the June Draft?

Thanks,
Rob

Text proposal:
<text>
In general, OOBC trumps UGE. 

OOBC:
When a party relies on OOBC, it MUST use the tracking status value "C" and a well as a provide a well known resource/control link to easily revoke consent. A user agent MAY change the DNT expression to DNT:0 for that network interaction.

UGE:
When a party relies on UGE, and a user grants a UGE, the user agent MUST change the DNT expression to DNT:0 for that network interaction. The user agent MUST provide easy access to the list of UGEs as well as provide a means to easily revoke an individual UGE or all UGEs. 
</text>