Re: [xhr2] PATCH support

Well, if we get our act together in the HTTP-WG, hopefully you'll  
have a registry to refer to.

On 2007/08/07, at 12:10 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:00:22 +0200, Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> On 8/6/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:38:52 +0200, Robert Sayre  
>>> <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Partial resource updates are a pretty compelling use case for XHR2.
>>>> You can always use POST for this, but it's a pain if you need to  
>>>> use
>>>> POST for something else.
>>>
>>> What exactly would need to be supported?
>>
>> I think it should be required.
>
> I actually hope we can solve the HTTP method stuff for real by the  
> time XHR2 is ready. By having either a blacklist or whitelist  
> depending on what is being implemented. (And having a list of  
> method names that are to be uppercased before the request is made.)
>
>
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot@yahoo-inc.com

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:22:38 UTC