- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:43:14 -0800
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > Jonas Sicking, Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:53:58 -0800: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >>>> Some responses are added in the wiki. >>>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/PoeticSemantics >>>> >>>> Already the first response from Peter Krantz suggests to use XHTML2 >>>> or RDFa. >>> >>> It strikes me that this is an example of a language which we could have >>> developed within HTML5, if Toby's Decentralized Extensibility proposal >>> had been implemented in HTML5. >> >> Given that this is a proposal for a spec, doesn't the "applicable >> specification" clause in HTML5 apply here? Meaning that HTML5 as it is >> already is able to deal with this particular case. >> >> Not saying that HTML5 has solved all the decentralized extensibility >> issues discussed in general. Just seems like this particular one is >> potentially dealt with. > > I agree that Olaf's literary mark-up language could be a candidate for > an applicable spec. How should he proceed to have it achieve that > status? *My* understanding (which could very well be wrong) is that the rules Sam laid out a while ago regarding FPWDs in this group still applies. Write up a draft, get a total of 3(?) people to commit to reviewing it and provide feedback, then request FPWD. But I admittedly haven't followed the discussion regarding what's within our charter closely enough to know if this strategy still applies. (And for the record, I don't have time or experience to provide technical feedback for such a draft). That's assuming you want to publish within W3C, and in this WG. For publishing elsewhere you'd have to follow the rules set out there. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 20:44:07 UTC