- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:58:54 +0100
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 5 Dec 2013, at 20:02, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've been working on my actions ACTION-115 and ACTION-116. > > You can find a set (should say list as it's ordered) of proposals for > ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90 at: > > * http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-89 > * http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-90 > > A few comments: > > * it proposes to make a Binary resource an LDPR (for unification and > consistency) +1 it's been very difficult to discuss issues clearly because we have been missing a name for this notion. > * it introduces the notion of containment +1 ldp:contains is a good name. > * containment is not related to membership +1 > * membership is not changed at all "membership triples" is not change at all you mean. > * it builds upon the new Containers, just replacing ldp:member with > ldp:contains (I explain the rational in the proposal) +1 > * the "it doubles the number of triples" issue is addressed +1 I like it that it also clears the LDPC. > * it specifies where the triples live, including the membership > triples That is great as it has been one of the sources of confusion. > > I think it's now up to Arnaud to decide if the proposals can be > discussed during the next meeting. > > You guys should really look into it as soon as possible and provide > feedback (or just ask questions), so that I can improve the proposals. > > Cheers, > Alexandre. > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 14:59:27 UTC