- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:48:22 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>, "Stephan, Eric G" <Eric.Stephan@pnnl.gov>, "Purohit, Sumit" <Sumit.Purohit@pnnl.gov>
Hi Phil, Riccardo and I are working on the last edits. If we have to finish by Friday then we won't have time to go through our entire wishlist of editorial changes, but so be it. As I explained in the last calls, Riccardo and I were not foreseeing any change to the vocabulary itself, anyway. Indeed Amrapali's mail has not been answered. Even though the last draft is actually from after Aug 4. We're working on it. Cheers, Antoine On 22/08/16 16:52, Phil Archer wrote: > Dear all, > > With the BP doc Transition call just over 2 hours away I'm just checking the overall state of play for the WG. > > There are 4 open actions but these all relate to the i18n comments so am I right that they can now all be closed? > > I note a lot of traffic about the DQV on the comments list - that's very good to see. There's one from Amrapali Zeveri on 13 Aug but the latest DQV ED is dated 4 Aug so I take it that hasn't been acted on? Will it be before final publication? (please take this as an entirely neutral question, not as a demand for action). > > DUV looks stable? But I see Issue 234 still open > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/234 > > As we line up in front of the Director - are we ready? > > Shout if you need me or others to do something. > > Phil. > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2016 14:48:54 UTC