- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:18:09 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On further examination of templates I no longer stand by my statements below. peter On 10/15/2015 09:04 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > On 10/08/2015 01:14 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> On 10/8/15 11:24 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> shapes-ISSUE-101 (templates as classes): use of rdfs:subClassOf for template >>> inheritance >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/101 >>> >>> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider >>> On product: >>> >>> rdfs:subClassOf is the subclass relationship between RDFS classes. >>> >>> SHACL uses rdfs:subClassOf for template inheritance. This implies that >>> SHACL templates are RDFS classes, which is not correct. >> >> Why is this not correct? >> >> Holger > > From RDF Schema 1.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ > > Resources may be divided into groups called classes. The members of a class > are known as instances of the class. Classes are themselves resources. They > are often identified by IRIs and may be described using RDF properties. The > rdf:type property may be used to state that a resource is an instance of a class. > > This does not describe a template. > > > peter >
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 16:18:39 UTC